Chemtrails: a rational explanation of what people are seeing
I first noticed longer-lasting aircraft trails back in 2008. At the time, I didn’t know why they behaved differently from the short-lived contrails I remembered from earlier years. Like many others, I could clearly see that something had changed.
I decided to look into the science behind what I was observing. What follows is a summary of the understanding I’ve gained by combining research from both aircraft engineering and atmospheric science. The studies and references used are listed at the end.
Jet engines burn fuel in a very predictable way. When fuel burns, it doesn’t disappear, it combines with oxygen and produces carbon dioxide, water vapour, and tiny particles. This chemistry is well understood, and there are no competing theories about how this works.
Jet fuels are carefully designed to work well inside engines. To do this, they contain very small amounts of sulfur and metallic elements. These ingredients have legitimate purposes such as protecting engines, improving performance, and preventing corrosion. Fuel manufacturers do not design fuels with atmospheric effects in mind, because what happens after combustion is outside their field.
Once the fuel is burned, however, those same trace ingredients form microscopic particles in the exhaust. Some metals create huge numbers of extremely small particles, while others make existing particles grow larger. Sulfur then coats these particles, allowing them to absorb water very efficiently. Although present in tiny amounts by weight, these ingredients exist in enormous numbers of atoms, enough to influence cloud formation.
Atmospheric scientists study how tiny particles interact with water vapour. Their research shows that small, sulfur-coated particles can trigger ice formation at lower humidity than larger particles with lower sufur content. Over the past few decades, many independent studies have confirmed that contrails can now form in air that is only slightly humid, below full saturation. Whereas, in the 1990s supersaturation was always required for trail formation.
When these two well-established fields are considered together, jet exhaust chemistry and cloud microphysics, a consistent picture emerges. Modern jet fuels, especially widely used fuels like Jet A1, tend to produce very large numbers of small particles that remain small but are highly effective at attracting water once coated with sulfur. This makes contrails more likely to form, last longer, and spread into cloud-like layers, even in skies that look clear blue to the eye.
This effect was not done with the express purpose of enhancing the trails in any way, and does not require any secret changes to fuel. In fact, the elements in the fuel are published openly in peer-reviewed literature. Because contrails are an unintended by-product, not a deliberate intervention, they are not classified as geoengineering, even though they influence clouds and weather. This consequence only becomes fully understandable when combining knowledge from both engineering and atmospheric science.
Global and local impacts
· Global warming (temperature): Persistent contrails cover only a very small fraction of the globe at any given time (roughly 0.5%). While the local radiative forcing under a single contrail can be very large (10–30 W/m²), contrails are transient and occupy only a tiny portion of the atmosphere at any moment. As a result, the global average effect is much smaller, around 0.05–0.15 W/m², approximately 10% of the total warming caused by CO₂ (~1.6 W/m²).
· Effects on weather patterns (local to regional and beyond): Although contrails have a smaller effect on global temperature than CO₂, they have a stronger influence over weather patterns. By trapping heat, reflecting sunlight, and providing ice nuclei for cloud formation, contrails affect temperatures, cloudiness, and precipitation not only near flight corridors but also over regions far from the flight paths. Studies have observed shifts in rainfall during monsoon seasons, changes in cloud cover during pandemic flight reductions, and regional temperature variations, showing that contrails can act like an accidental form of “geoengineering.”
Mitigation and future options
Because contrail formation depend on high humidity, several studies have shown that relatively small changes in flight altitude or routing can substantially reduce persistent contrail formation. Even minor adjustments, on the order of hundreds of metres, can move aircraft out of ice‑supersaturated or contrail‑prone layers, significantly reducing the number and lifetime of contrail cirrus, often with only a small fuel penalty.
Earlier mitigation strategies focused on avoiding ice‑supersaturated regions, where contrails were known to persist. More recent research shows that contrails can now form and grow in subsaturated regions, which makes avoidance less straightforward. As a result, mitigation now relies more on detailed weather data, probabilistic forecasting, and flexible routing rather than simple altitude rules.
Evidence suggests that oxides of aluminium, iron, chromium, titanium, and silicon are dominant contributors to the formation of extremely small exhaust particles that act as efficient ice nuclei. Reducing the formation or emission of these particles, whether through fuel refinement, engine design, or exhaust treatment, represents a plausible pathway for contrail mitigation and is an active area for future research.
Key takeaway: Contrails are a well-understood atmospheric effect of jet exhaust. They do not involve any secret spraying, nor are they a deliberate attempt to alter weather. They are an unintended consequence of routine aviation fuel chemistry interacting with atmospheric physics. While their contribution to global warming is modest, contrails influence weather and climate patterns far from where they formed, including regional effects such as shifts in precipitation and impacts on Asian monsoon seasons. Once the mechanisms are properly understood, strategies such as optimised flight routing and metalic particle reduction offer realistic ways to reduce contrail formation and their effects on weather.
References:
Abegglen, M., Brem, B.T., Ellenrieder, M., Durdina, L., Rindlisbacher, T., Wang, J., Lohmann, U. and Sierau, B., 2016. Chemical characterization of freshly emitted particulate matter from aircraft exhaust using single particle mass spectrometry. Atmospheric Environment, 134, pp.181-197. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1352231016302424?via%3
Campbell, S.E., Bragg, M.B. and Neogi, N.A., 2013. Fuel-optimal trajectory generation for persistent contrail mitigation. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 36(6), pp.1741-1750. https://arc.aiaa.org/doi/abs/10.2514/1.55969
Dzambo, A.M. and Turner, D.D., 2016. Characterizing relative humidity with respect to ice in midlatitude cirrus clouds as a function of atmospheric state. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 121(20), pp.12-253. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdfdirect/10.1002/2015JD024643
Fichter, C., Marquart, S., Sausen, R. and Lee, D.S., 2005. The impact of cruise altitude on contrails and related radiative forcing. Meteorologische Zeitschrift, 14, pp.563-572. https://elib.dlr.de/19556/1/mz.pdf
Gao, R.S., Rosenlof, K.H., Kärcher, B., Tilmes, S., Toon, O.B., Maloney, C. and Yu, P., 2021. Toward practical stratospheric aerosol albedo modification: Solar-powered lofting. Science Advances, 7(20), p.eabe3416. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8121417/
Gettelman, A., Chen, C.C. and Bardeen, C.G., 2021. The Climate Impact of COVID19 Induced Contrail Changes. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Discussions, 2021, pp.1-17. https://acp.copernicus.org/preprints/acp-2021-210/acp-2021-210-manuscript-version2.pdf
Gierens, Klaus, Sigrun Matthes, and Susanne Rohs. "How well can persistent contrails be predicted?." Aerospace 7, no. 12 (2020): 169. https://www.mdpi.com/2226-4310/7/12/169
Gysel, M., Nyeki, S., Weingartner, E., Baltensperger, U., Giebl, H., Hitzenberger, R., Petzold, A. and Wilson, C.W., 2003. Properties of jet engine combustion particles during the PartEmis experiment: Hygroscopicity at subsaturated conditions. Geophysical research letters, 30(11). https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029/2003GL016896
Haywood, J.M., Allan, R.P., Bornemann, J., Forster, P.M., Francis, P.N., Milton, S., Rädel, G., Rap, A., Shine, K.P. and Thorpe, R., 2009. A case study of the radiative forcing of persistent contrails evolving into contrail‐induced cirrus. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 114(D24). https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029/2009JD012650
Haywood J, Singh S, and Hardman 2023. How High Can Commercial Passenger Planes Fly https://simpleflying.com/how-high-can-commercial-passenger-planes-fly/
Heymsfield, A.J., Lawson, R.P. and Sachse, G.W., 1998. Growth of ice crystals in a precipitating contrail. Geophysical Research Letters, 25(9), pp.1335-1338. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdfdirect/10.1029/98GL00189
Jensen, E.J., Toon, O.B., Kinne, S., Sachse, G.W., Anderson, B.E., Chan, K.R., Twohy, C.H., Gandrud, B., Heymsfield, A. and Miake‐Lye, R.C., 1998. Environmental conditions required for contrail formation and persistence. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 103(D4), pp.3929-3936. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1029/97JD02808
Lewellen, D.C., 2014. Persistent contrails and contrail cirrus. Part II: Full lifetime behavior. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 71(12), pp.4420-4438. https://journals.ametsoc.org/view/journals/atsc/71/12/jas-d-13-0317.1.xml?tab_body=pdf
Li, Y., Mahnke, C., Rohs, S., Bundke, U., Spelten, N., Dekoutsidis, G., Groß, S., Voigt, C., Schumann, U., Petzold, A. and Krämer, M., 2022. Upper tropospheric slightly ice-subsaturated regions: Frequency of occurrence and statistical evidence for the appearance of contrail cirrus. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Discussions, 2022, pp.1-32. https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/23/2251/2023/
Magee, N.B., Miller, A., Amaral, M. and Cumiskey, A., 2014. Mesoscopic surface roughness of ice crystals pervasive across a wide range of ice crystal conditions. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 14(22), pp.12357-12371. https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/14/12357/2014/acp-14-12357-2014.pdf
Meehl, G.A., Arblaster, J.M. and Collins, W.D., 2008. Effects of black carbon aerosols on the Indian monsoon. Journal of Climate, 21(12), pp.2869-2882. https://journals.ametsoc.org/view/journals/clim/21/12/2007jcli1777.1.xml?tab_body=abstract-display
Meijer, V.R., Kulik, L., Eastham, S.D., Allroggen, F., Speth, R.L., Karaman, S. and Barrett, S.R., 2022. Contrail coverage over the United States before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Environmental Research Letters, 17(3), p.034039. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/ac26f0/pdf
MIT News 2010 Explained: Radiative forcing. https://news.mit.edu/2010/explained-radforce-0309
Moldanova, J., Langner, J., Lindskog, M., Mårtensson, T., Priestley, M., Wall, M., Ziverts, U., Ekstrand, H., Näs, A. and Wilhelmsson, J., 2022. Optimisation of flight routes for reduced climate impact (OP-FLYKLIM). https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2%3A1686647&dswid=-1152
Noppel, F., Singh, R. and Taylor, M., 2006, September. Contrail and cirrus cloud avoidance. In 25th International Congress of the Aeronautical Sciences (pp. 1-8). http://www.icas.org/ICAS_ARCHIVE/ICAS2006/PAPERS/136.PDF
Sassen, K., 1997. Contrail-cirrus and their potential for regional climate change. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 78(9), pp.1885-1904. https://journals.ametsoc.org/view/journals/bams/78/9/1520-0477_1997_078_1885_ccatpf_2_0_co_2.xml
Sausen, R., Gierens, K., Ponater, M. and Schumann, U., 1998. A Diagnostic Study of the Global Distribution of Contrails Part I: Present Day Climateast. Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 61(3), pp.127-141. https://elib.dlr.de/9030/1/traplclim-1998.pdf
Shell fuel additives: https://www.shell.com/business-customers/aviation/aviation-fuel/aeroshell-performance-additive.html
Schumann, U., Poll, I., Teoh, R., Koelle, R., Spinielli, E., Molloy, J., Koudis, G.S., Baumann, R., Bugliaro, L., Stettler, M. and Voigt, C., 2021. Air traffic and contrail changes over Europe during COVID-19: a model study. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 21(10), pp.7429-7450. https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/21/7429/2021/acp-21-7429-2021.pdf
Shumway, L.A., 2000. Trace element and Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon analyses of jet engine fuels: Jet A, JP5, and JP8(No. SSCSDTR1845). https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/ADA396143.pdf?fbclid=IwAR3fOoAa8HW8UlflZb9_iZZjLX-YICm7bOExgmRM_4vdyHSJLpFI8gVvv4A
Teoh, R., Schumann, U. and Stettler, M.E., 2020. Beyond contrail avoidance: Efficacy of flight altitude changes to minimise contrail climate forcing. Aerospace, 7(9), p.121. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/335014373.pdf
Teoh, R., Schumann, U., Majumdar, A. and Stettler, M.E., 2020. Mitigating the climate forcing of aircraft contrails by small-scale diversions and technology adoption. Environmental science & technology, 54(5), pp.2941-2950. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.est.9b05608
University of Wyoming Atmospheric Science Radiosonde Archive https://weather.uwyo.edu/upperair/sounding.shtml
Vander Wal, R.L., Bryg, V.M. and Huang, C.H., 2016. Chemistry characterization of jet aircraft engine particulate matter by XPS: Results from APEX III. Atmospheric Environment, 140, pp.623-629. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20140012043/downloads/20140012043.pdf
Voigt, C., Kleine, J., Sauer, D., Moore, R.H., Bräuer, T., Le Clercq, P., Kaufmann, S., Scheibe, M., Jurkat-Witschas, T., Aigner, M. and Bauder, U., 2021. Cleaner burning aviation fuels can reduce contrail cloudiness. Communications Earth & Environment, 2(1), p.114. https://www.nature.com/articles/s43247-021-00174-y
Wang, Z., Bugliaro, L., Jurkat-Witschas, T., Heller, R., Burkhardt, U., Ziereis, H., Dekoutsidis, G., Wirth, M., Groß, S., Kirschler, S. and Kaufmann, S., 2022. Observations of microphysical properties and radiative effects of contrail cirrus and natural cirrus over the North Atlantic. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Discussions, 2022, pp.1-36. https://acp.copernicus.org/preprints/acp-2022-537/acp-2022-537.pdf
Wilhelm, L., Gierens, K. and Rohs, S., 2022. Meteorological conditions that promote persistent contrails. Applied Sciences, 12(9), p.4450. https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/12/9/4450
Wilson, T.W., Murray, B.J., Wagner, R., Möhler, O., Saathoff, H., Schnaiter, M., Skrotzki, J., Price, H.C., Malkin, T.L., Dobbie, S. and Al-Jumur, S.M.R.K., 2012. Glassy aerosols with a range of compositions nucleate ice heterogeneously at cirrus temperatures. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 12(18), pp.8611-8632. https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/12/8611/2012/acp-12-8611-2012.pdf
Xie, X., Myhre, G., Liu, X., Li, X., Shi, Z., Wang, H., Kirkevåg, A., Lamarque, J.F., Shindell, D., Takemura, T. and Liu, Y., 2020. Distinct responses of Asian summer monsoon to black carbon aerosols and greenhouse gases. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Discussions, 2020, pp.1-31. https://www.osti.gov/biblio/1661632
Yin, F., Grewe, V., Frömming, C. and Yamashita, H., 2018. Impact on flight trajectory characteristics when avoiding the formation of persistent contrails for transatlantic flights. Transportation research part D: Transport and environment, 65, pp.466-484. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1361920917309987
Zielinski S. 2015. Airplane Contrails May Be Creating Accidental Geoengineering. https://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/airplane-contrails-may-be-creating-accidental-geoengineering-180957561/?fbclid=IwZXh0bgNhZW0CMTAAAR32IIkKEdefHX8KqIvIj-yMzI5Cxo2WVAb1vzc6NMm24K95XGwcnKKURrc_aem_qrOlCtE8vnB3UeAfq5dsfQ